Wrapping up his investigation into Saddam Hussein's purported arsenal, the CIA's top weapons hunter in Iraq said his search for weapons of mass destruction "has been exhausted" without finding any.
Nor did he find any evidence that such weapons were shipped officially from Iraq to Syria to be hidden before the U.S. invasion, but he couldn't rule out some unofficial transfer of limited WMD-related materials.
Ok, didn't this get reported weeks ago, or is this a different outfit saying the same thing again? Of course it's headline news again, and Allah forbid the MSM would report about any good news in Iraq. And you have to love this single-sentence paragraph:
The Bush administration justified its 2003 invasion of Iraq as necessary to eliminate Hussein's purported stockpile of WMD.
Anyone who thinks WMD was the only single solitary justification for going into in Iraq is a liberal tool. Go ahead and whine your head off about how "removing a brutal dictator" was an afterthought because of the lack of WMD. Then read the 2003 State of the Union Address and explain why you're still whining. Maybe it's because I actually followed the whole ordeal from 9/11 that I wasn't suprised, and I didn't feel lied to. Because I actually knew what was going on. Let the THC drain from your system for a few days, and you'll probably realize that America isn't such a bad place after all. Hey, I'm no blind patriot, but you have to admit that this really isn't a cesspool of slime and vermin that Michael Moore pretends it is to sell books. Well... speaking of Michael Moore... Noam Chomsky... and Ward Churchill... yeah, I guess you're right. America is a cesspool of slime and vermin.
P.S. Wasn't it the CIA's faulty intelligence that said that WMD was there in the first place? Should we really be trusting the CIA with this report that there aren't any?
No comments:
Post a Comment